How To Write a Good
Proof 

Have you ever asked, "WHY DO WE HAVE TO LEARN THIS PROOF STUFF ANYWAY? I'M NEVER GOING TO HAVE TO PROVE THAT A RHOMBUS IS A CONVEX QUADRILATERAL IN REAL LIFE!" Well we sure have. Geometry proofs can sometimes be overwhelming. We at themathlab.com realize this and have developed to try to show you that proof is, like many things, an intellectual GAME. It's fun once you get good at it, and being good at it makes your powers of reason MUCH stronger. No, you will probably never need to prove that a rhombus is a convex quadrilateral in "real life", but learning how to do it will develop a strong logical circuit in your brain. So come on and join us, play your way to a strong, logical brain. See if you can master all the levels of . The two most important things a proof must possess are clarity and backup. Over the years, we've read some awful proofs and some wonderful proofs. Without a doubt the wonderful ones were wonderful because WE COULD UNDERSTAND THEM!!!!! There is absolutely no reason to write a proof unless your reader can understand what you're saying. Keep this in mind as you write. We always try to pretend we are speaking to someone who has very limited mathematical knowledge and who doesn't know what facts we have been "given". Therefore, when we state a property or a theorem or a definition as backup, we always explain it in the proof. We never assume for example, that our reader knows what the second part of the distance postulate is by memory. We also make sure that we state the necessary parts that have been "given" to us. ASSUME YOUR READER KNOWS VERY LITTLE. Also keep in mind that THERE IS NEVER JUST ONE WAY OF STATING A PROOF. Actually there are even several ways of presenting a proof argument:
So don't worry about trying to match a "perfect wording". Just be sure that your statements are clear, and that they are each backed up with a legal reason. A good measure of the quality of your proof is found by reading it to a person who has not taken a geometry course or who hasn't been in one for a long time. If they can understand your proof by just reading it, and they don't need any verbal explanation from you, then you have a good proof. Now go play and have some fun growing smarter! Sincerely, The staff at themathlab.com ***And for a real relaxing laugh you could read the 36 Humorous Methods of Mathematical Proof, we love them here.*** 

How to Play  Game Levels  Reasons  Cards  Game Board  Writing Proofs
Copyright 19992009 themathlab.com

The classic "twocolumn proof":
Given: 

Prove: 

1.) Figure ABCDEF is a union of segments in the plane:  1.) Given 
2.) , , , , and are the only segments in the figure.  2.) Given 
3.) intersects with only at point B, and point A intersects no other segment.  3.) Given 
4.) Therefore, Figure ABCDEF is not a polygon.  4.) It violates the definition of polygon. 
Given: 

Prove: We are given figure ABCDEF which is a union of segments in a plane. connects only to at point B, and point A is left unintersected. also connects to at C. also connects to at D. connects to at E. connects to no other segment and in fact, point F is left completely unintersected. Now since figure ABCDEF has two segments, and , which only connect with one other segment, it cannot be a polygon. For in a polygon, by definition, all segments intersect two others, one at each endpoint.

This is the way we write them at themathlab.com:
Given: 

Prove: 

1.)  We are given figure ABCDEF which is a union of segments in a plane. 
2.)  We are also given that intersects only at point b, and endpoint A does not intersect any other segment. 
3.)  Therefore figure ABCDEF can not be a polygon because it violates the definition of polygon which states, in part, that each segment of a polygon intersects two others, one at each endpoint. 